I’m sure that at some point in your life that you’ve been told ‘you’re pretty smart’ by someone, whether it was a parent, a teacher or a colleague. But what does it actually mean to be told that you’re smart?
On a literal level, the dictionary defines ‘smart’ as ‘having or showing a quick-witted intelligence‘, and intelligence is defined as ‘the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills’. But who is measuring our ability to apply knowledge and skills, and how are we measuring it? How we’re measuring being ‘smart’ seems a bit ambiguous, so is it all based on your individual perspective? Is it based on using previous comparisons? Who really has the ability to decide who’s smart and who’s not smart? How do we decide who to label as being ‘really smart?’
I was curious to know the answers to these questions, so I did what any curious person would do in 2019 – I grabbed my smartphone and I googled ‘what does it mean to be smart?’ Fortunately, I found tons of readily available articles about the topic ‘what does it means to be smart?’.
So, I started reading about what it means to be smart. Or more specifically, I started reading and I looked for patterns, to see what sort of principles popped up on a consistent basis, and what the general consensus on the matter is.
Not surprisingly, different articles on the topic gave me different perspectives. But there were a few attributes that I consistently found across several articles, such as:
- Being smart, much like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder
- Being smart is something that you can be in one domain, but not in another domain, similar to how you can be confident in your professional life but not in your dating life
- Being smart is something that’s grown and cultivated, often by being curious enough to seek out new information and by recognising what you don’t already know
- Being smart is the ability to put ideas together, and create solutions to problems
- Being smart is the ability to focus, concentrate, and communicate
So, it appears that being smart is something that depends on your perspective of what realm you’re talking about it in. For myself, I can be smart in things such as psychology and the history of some sports, but I’m definitely not smart when it comes to discussing palaeontology because I admittedly know about as little about the topic as a human can.
Nonetheless, ‘smart’ is a vague term and it depends on your perspective. But as far as I’m concerned, the ultimate sign of a smart person is a person who recognises that while they may already know a lot, there is still far more out there left for them to learn. Because like most (if not all) things in life, there is always a higher level for you to aspire to hit when it comes to being smart.
So for anyone who wants to be ‘smart’, or to even be ‘smarter’ than you already are, I suggest this: Be curious, and have a desire to continuously evolve. Continue to learn more, take the knowledge that you have, be willing to make it your own, and be able to communicate what you see with your unique set of knowledge and experiences to others. Because when it comes down to it, what I think makes someone smart is their desire to learn more, and their desire to use what they’ve learned to solve problems moving forward.
Image credit: Freepik
Matthew Buckley is an organisational psychologist. He holds a master’s degree in organisational psychology from the University of New Haven.
Disclaimer: Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only. Materials on this website are not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on this website. Read our full disclaimer here.