Home Society & Culture There’s a Better Way to Think About Being Kept Waiting at Work, Research Reveals

There’s a Better Way to Think About Being Kept Waiting at Work, Research Reveals

Reading Time: 2 minutes

While no one at work wants to be kept waiting, according to a new study by researchers from Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU) and the University of British Columbia (UBC), reactions to waiting can be managed to reduce aggression that may result.

‘We spend a part of our daily life waiting, and unfortunately, wait time can fuel aggressive tendencies,’ says Dr Dorit Efrat-Treister, from the BGU Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management. ‘Our study examines the relationship between wait time, perceived wait time, and aggressive tendencies from a construal level perspective.’

Construal level refers to how abstract or concrete people perceive, comprehend and interpret the world around them.

Generally, abstract thinking leads to better outcomes, such as more creativity, broader vision and feeling more powerful. However, in the paper published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior, Dr Efrat-Trieste, and UBC researchers Michael Daniels and Sandra Robinson demonstrate that abstract thinking can also lead to undesired outcomes in stressful situations, such as waiting.

‘For example, if you are waiting for someone who is late to meet you, you are better off thinking in concrete terms, like assuming they got stuck in a traffic jam compared with abstract terms, like assuming they are disrespecting you,’ Dr Efrat-Treister says.

‘When someone is late for a call, if you think abstractly, you may think they don’t respect your time, or they don’t think the call is important, and therefore you might get angry. But if you think they may have just misplaced your number or got another call first, you won’t become so annoyed.’

In the experiments, the researchers arranged a meeting of people in a lab and each were told their partner was late. Sitting in separate rooms, each waited for 30 seconds, 5 minutes, or 10 minutes. Those that were prompted to think abstractly perceived the waiting time as longer, and reacted more aggressively than those that were led to think concretely.

Generation Y and Z participants had an especially difficult time in the experiment without their smartphones. They started banging on the desks or fidgeting, and self-reported high levels of aggression after waiting for even short durations of time.

‘We showed that the level of abstractness influences how long or short someone perceives actual wait time. Therefore, we can influence the perception of the wait time and thus manage aggression,’ Dr Efrat-Treister says.

It can be both costly and difficult for organisations to reduce real wait time and may require additional resources aren’t available. As the study shows, managers can reduce the perception of wait time without adding resources by priming people to think more concretely, and distracting them from the time that has passed.

‘For example, medical offices might want to install video monitors with concrete information that distracts from long wait times,’ Dr Efrat-Treister says. ‘The leader of a meeting can focus on getting started and on the agenda rather than focusing on why a partner is late. Any concrete focus that prevents abstract thinking about waiting can be helpful.’


Image credit: Freepik

© Copyright 2014–2034 Psychreg Ltd