Home Society & Culture Unravelling the Human Development Index: The Ultimate Measure of Progress

Unravelling the Human Development Index: The Ultimate Measure of Progress

Reading Time: 4 minutes

As the world continues to evolve, it becomes increasingly essential to measure the progress of nations accurately. Traditional metrics, such as gross domestic product (GDP), have long been used as the primary indicator of a country’s development. However, this approach only considers economic growth, ignoring critical aspects of human well-being. Enter the human development index (HDI), a more comprehensive tool for evaluating a nation’s overall progress. 

Understanding the human development index

Introduced in 1990 by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq and Indian economist Amartya Sen, the HDI is a statistical composite index designed to measure a country’s development across three essential dimensions: health, education, and standard of living. By taking these factors into account, the HDI provides a more accurate reflection of a nation’s progress and quality of life.

HDI Components and Calculation

The HDI comprises three primary indicators, each representing a critical dimension of human development:

  • Health: life expectancy at birth. This indicator represents the average number of years a newborn can expect to live, assuming age-specific mortality rates remain constant throughout their lifetime. Life expectancy is a crucial aspect of the HDI, as it reflects the overall health and well-being of a population.
  • Education: Mean years of schooling and expected years of schooling. Mean years of schooling measures the average number of years of education received by people aged 25 and older. Expected Years of Schooling, on the other hand, represents the total number of years of schooling a child entering primary education can expect to receive throughout their lifetime, considering current enrollment rates. These two indicators together provide insight into the education level and opportunities available in a country.
  • Standard of living: Gross national income (GNI) per capita. GNI per capita is the total income generated by a country’s residents (including those living abroad) divided by the total population. It serves as a proxy for the overall standard of living, taking into account the resources available to individuals within a nation.

To calculate the HDI, each dimension is assigned an index value between 0 and 1. The geometric mean of these three indices results in the overall HDI value, which also ranges from 0 to 1. A higher HDI value signifies better human development, while a lower value indicates a lower level of development.

Why the HDI matters

The HDI offers numerous advantages over traditional economic indicators like GDP. Here are a few reasons why the HDI is so significant:

  • Comprehensive measurement. Unlike GDP, which solely focuses on economic growth, the HDI considers multiple aspects of human development. By incorporating health, education, and standard of living, it offers a more complete picture of a nation’s overall progress.
  • Better policy decisions. The HDI helps governments identify development gaps and prioritise their efforts accordingly. By highlighting areas of improvement, policymakers can make more informed decisions and allocate resources more effectively.
  • Global comparisons. The HDI enables comparisons between countries, allowing for a better understanding of global development trends. By ranking nations based on their HDI scores, the index highlights the disparities in development and encourages global cooperation to address these gaps.
  • Encourages sustainable development. The HDI promotes a holistic approach to development, emphasising the importance of improving human well-being rather than just increasing economic growth. As a result, it encourages countries to adopt policies that support sustainable and equitable development.

HDI limitations and criticisms

Despite its advantages, the HDI is not without its shortcomings. Some limitations and criticisms include:

  • Limited scope. The HDI only considers three dimensions of development, which may not fully capture the complexities of human progress. Other important factors, such as environmental sustainability, political freedom, and gender equality, are not directly included in the index.
  • Aggregated data. The HDI relies on aggregated national data, which may not accurately represent the development disparities within a country. Regional and local variations are often overlooked, masking the inequalities that exist among different population groups.
  • Data reliability. The HDI calculation depends on the accuracy and availability of data for each country. In some cases, data may be incomplete or outdated, leading to inaccurate HDI values and rankings.
  • Insensitivity to income distribution. While the HDI accounts for a nation’s average income, it does not consider income distribution. As a result, countries with high income inequality might still have high HDI values, despite a significant portion of the population living in poverty.

The way forward: complementary indices

To address the limitations of the HDI, additional indices have been introduced to provide a more comprehensive assessment of human development. Some of these complementary indices include:

  • Inequality-adjusted human development index (IHDI). The IHDI adjusts the HDI for inequalities in health, education, and income, providing a more accurate representation of human development in the presence of income disparities.
  • Gender development index (GDI). The GDI compares the HDI values of men and women within a country, highlighting gender-based inequalities in development.
  • Gender inequality index (GII). The GII assesses gender inequalities in reproductive health, empowerment, and economic activity, shedding light on the barriers faced by women in achieving their full potential.
  • Multidimensional poverty index (MPI). The MPI identifies multiple deprivations in health, education, and living standards, providing a more detailed understanding of poverty and its various dimensions.


The human development index has undoubtedly revolutionised the way we measure national progress, shifting the focus from economic growth to a more holistic approach that considers health, education, and standard of living. While the HDI has its limitations, it remains a valuable tool for assessing human development and guiding policy decisions. By complementing the HDI with additional indices, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of development, ensuring that no one is left behind as we strive for a more equitable and sustainable world.

Tim Williamson, a psychology graduate from the University of Hertfordshire, has a keen interest in the fields of mental health, wellness, and lifestyle.

© Copyright 2014–2034 Psychreg Ltd