Home Personal Essays The Therapy Gap: Who Is Actually Helping Grey Area Drinkers?

The Therapy Gap: Who Is Actually Helping Grey Area Drinkers?

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Quick summary: Grey area drinkers occupy a substantial middle ground between moderate alcohol use and clinical dependence yet often find existing support unsuitable because it demands acceptance of an alcoholic identity they reject. This binary approach in healthcare leaves many high functioning individuals without appropriate help leading them either to manage alone with mixed results or to dismiss their concerns entirely which harms their mental health relationships and overall wellbeing. Practitioners can bridge this gap through brief non judgemental interventions such as motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural methods that prioritise personal goals like moderation over abstinence thereby improving engagement and supporting better public health outcomes.




There is a specific kind of appointment I have fairly often. A client sits down usually composed, usually articulate, usually professionally accomplished and tells me they have been trying to get help with their drinking for some time. They have looked at what is available but they have ruled it all out.

They are not in crisis, they do not need to go to AA or do a detix. They do not identify with the word “alcoholic” and are not willing to walk into a room where everyone uses it. They know they probably drink too much, but don’t know where to get support to change that. Not because the support is difficult to access, but because the support that exists does not feel like it suits them.

This is the current therapy gap to do with alcohol and it is a significant one.

Who are grey area drinkers?

The term “grey area drinking” describes people who fall between two categories, those who drink within recommended guidelines (in the UK, no more than 14 units per week) and those who meet the clinical threshold for alcohol use disorder. They overdrink in ways that affect their well-being, relationships, sleep, and mood. However they do not present as people in crisis, and they do not meet the diagnostic criteria that would open door to formal treatment.

This group is large and research consistently suggests that most people drinking at harmful levels in the UK are not dependent on alcohol and are not seeking or receiving treatment. Many are what you might call high-functioning, they are people managing careers, families and responsibilities while quietly worrying about how much they drink.

The binary that leaves people behind

Mental health provision around alcohol tends to operate on a binary. Either you have a serious problem and need structured, often abstinence-based intervention or you do not have a problem and no support is required. The large and significant middle ground remains mostly unaddressed.

This is not a criticism of our health services which operate with finite resources and reasonable thresholds. It is an observation about what the system is not built to accommodate.

The psychological consequence matters, when someone who is genuinely concerned about their drinking looks at what is available and concludes that “that is not for me,” there are two possible outcomes. The first is that they address it alone, with varying success. The second and more common in my clinical experience is that the act of ruling out formal help gives them permission to conclude they don’t have a problem worth addressing.

The label acts as a barrier and people do not avoid help because they lack insight. They avoid help because the help available requires them to accept an identity they do not recognise.

What actually works for this group?

The evidence on brief, structured interventions for hazardous and harmful drinking is reasonably encouraging. NICE guidance supports brief alcohol interventions delivered in primary care settings, like short conversations focused on behaviour change rather than identity or diagnosis. These types of interventions work, but they are also chronically underused.

Motivational interviewing, cognitive-behavioural approaches, and in my own specialism clinical hypnotherapy, all offer frameworks that do not require the person to accept a particular label. They work with the person’s own reasons for change, their own values, their own sense of what a better relationship with alcohol would look like. The goal does not need to be abstinence and for most people it is not something they want to get to, instead a balance between drinking and non-drinking days and sensible drinking limits when they do drink.

That flexibility is, precisely the point a 2019 Cochrane review found that goal choice that allows people to aim for moderation rather than abstinence, can improve engagement and outcomes among those who do not identify as dependent. The barrier to help is often not willingness to change. It is whether the change on offer fits the person.

What this means in practice

For practitioners reading this, the grey area drinker in your consulting room may not volunteer their concern. They are often the high-functioning, apparently coping client who mentions, almost as an aside, that they have been relying on wine a bit too much lately. 

For anyone who recognises themselves in this description: the absence of a crisis does not mean the absence of a problem worth addressing. There is more nuanced support available than the binary of “you’re fine” or “you need treatment” suggests. 

If you’d like to understand more about where grey area drinking begins and what addressing it can look like, this is a useful place to start.

The therapy gap exists, but it is not unfillable. It just requires practitioners, systems, and individuals to acknowledge the very large number of people sitting quietly in the middle of it.

A note: if you or someone you support is experiencing symptoms of physical dependence on alcohol such as shaking, sweating, or significant anxiety when not drinking then please seek medical advice before making changes to alcohol intake. Physical dependence requires clinical supervision.




Tansy Forrest is a clinical hypnotherapist (DHyp, MNCH, MA) with over a decade of experience specialising in alcohol moderation. She is the author of Ten Steps to Drink Less and Live Well and works with clients across the UK and internationally.