Home Mind & Brain Study Links Visual Patterns and Motor Skills in Down Syndrome and Autism

Study Links Visual Patterns and Motor Skills in Down Syndrome and Autism

Reading Time: 2 minutes

A recent study published in the journal Augmentative and Alternative Communication reveals a significant correlation between visual fixation patterns and motor selection in individuals with Down syndrome and those on the autism spectrum. Conducted by researchers at Pennsylvania State University, this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between visual processing and motor responses, potentially impacting the design and assessment of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems.

AAC systems are critical for individuals whose speech does not meet all their communication needs. These systems range from simple communication books to advanced speech-output devices. The effectiveness of AAC systems hinges on how well they match the user’s needs and abilities. Previous research has shown that visual-perceptual characteristics of AAC displays play a significant role in their usability. However, the direct relationship between visual search efficiency and motor selection efficiency had not been empirically studied until now.

The study involved two separate groups: ten adolescents on the autism spectrum and nine individuals with Down syndrome. Participants were asked to complete a visual search task using simulated AAC displays consisting of a main visual scene display (VSD) and a navigation bar with thumbnail VSDs. Eye tracking technologies measured the time taken to visually fixate on a target thumbnail VSD after an auditory prompt and the time taken to select the target with a finger.

Results from both groups demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between visual fixation latencies and motor selection latencies. For individuals on the autism spectrum, a near-perfect correlation was observed, indicating that those who fixated on the target more quickly also selected it more quickly. Similarly, a moderate to strong correlation was found for individuals with Down syndrome.

Participants on the autism spectrum exhibited more variability in their responses, which aligns with the inherent diversity of autism as a spectrum condition. Notably, two participants on the autism spectrum showed significantly longer latencies for both visual fixation and motor selection, highlighting the need for further research to explore individual differences and underlying factors affecting these processes.

The study’s findings suggest that visual fixation patterns can be a reliable proxy for assessing motor selection efficiency in AAC users. This has significant implications for clinical practice, as using eye tracking to evaluate visual search efficiency could streamline the assessment process, making it less demanding and more efficient. Traditional AAC assessments often require multiple trials of motor selection tasks, which can be lengthy and frustrating for users. By contrast, assessing visual fixation is quicker and less strenuous.

The strong correlation between visual fixation and motor selection supports the importance of optimising AAC display designs to reduce visual cognitive load and enhance both visual search and motor selection efficiency. Even minor adjustments in display design, such as the arrangement of symbols, can significantly impact performance. For example, clustering symbols by colour or spatial grouping can facilitate quicker visual searches and selections.

While this study provides a foundational understanding of the relationship between visual and motor processes in AAC use, further research is needed to generalise these findings across a broader range of participants and AAC systems. Future studies should explore different disability groups, access techniques, and the effects of display design changes over time. Additionally, research should investigate the relationship between visual fixation and motor selection during actual communicative interactions in natural settings, as opposed to controlled experimental environments.

© Copyright 2014–2034 Psychreg Ltd