A BSA Early Career Forum Event
04 July 2018 (9:00am–5:00pm)
De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
Panel: Professor Chrissie Rogers (Bradford), Francis Ryan (The Guardian) and Kitt Bolton (DPAC); Other speakers TBA
In association with the British Sociological Association – Early Career Forum and the Centre for Urban Research on Austerity (CURA) at De Montfort University we are organising a conference on 4th July 2018. This participatory and interdisciplinary event examines what disability research encompasses in terms of theoretical directions and practical methodologies when thinking of diverse coalitions in sociology (Holmwood 2010, Burawoy 2013, Cooper 2013). It asks if socially just agendas for equality can be created in neoliberal times and how to go about this? We decided to work from the perspective of social ‘coalitions’ to think critically about collaborations (Barvosa-Carter 2001) and create an intersectional space (Crenshaw, 1991) where we could learn from differing innovative approaches to interdisciplinary research (Cho et al., 2013, Collins & Bilge 2016).
The theme of this event mirrors the focus by the Centre for Urban Research on Austerity (CURA) on developing interdisciplinary, cross-faculty research partnerships committed to advancing the idea of The Emancipatory City. It poses critical questions regarding how the relationship between government and urban spaces is changing what constitutes society’s social fabric for inclusion and tolerance of diversity (Lees, 2004). It asks how urban spaces that are predominantly ableist in nature can challenge social exclusion, care-less spaces (Rogers, 2016), and the stigmatisation of disabled people under current austerity measures. The event focuses on how disability research across different disciplines can benefit from each other to explore how public and private spaces can become more inclusive and socially-just for disabled people. It examines how interdisciplinary academic spaces can conscientiously engage in socially-just disability research within a neoliberal form of government.
We aim to provide a space for interdisciplinary learning and discussion about what understandings of freedom and social justice are implied by the emancipatory city. The discussions will be around the following themes:
- Inclusion: What does inclusion mean in the city? Who defines what disability means and the methods of research? Is the term ‘disability’ outdated and do we need something else? Does inclusion mean participation co-production or emancipation? Who are allies and what does that mean? What kind of political and social changes does disability research inspire? Can disabled people do research that is controlled by an able-bodied academy? Is it socially just to do disability research in neoliberal times?
- Interdisciplinarity: What does interdisciplinary disability research look like and how does it become enacted? What kinds of methods and methodologies are at stake? Can we also think about interdisciplinarity in terms of critical theories and their use? Do we think of disability as part of interdisciplinarity? Who controls and sets an interdisciplinary research agenda? What are the theoretical and practical aims of interdisciplinarity and what or who do they align with? What are the potentials of intersectionality for social justice and emancipation in a space? How do they become operationalised?
- Impact: What should the impact of disability research be and for whom? The Research Council’s ‘pathways to impact’ (Research Councils UK, 2014) emphasises working in terms of co-production to achieve ‘impact’ (Mathews, 2017) but is that what disability research does or should do? Should we be rethinking an independent impact agenda in terms of public, practice, and policy or working towards multiple impacts? Impacts are also increasing quantified but should we also be evaluating the qualitative aspects, such as inclusive spaces? How can we engage in more socially just, equitable and non-oppressive research agendas and impacts? What will the unintended impacts of disability research be for city spaces? What do we do when there is no impact or when an urban site oppresses?
Call for Abstracts
We are seeking abstracts for paper presentations that fit with the conference theme. It should be no more than 250 words, and in British English. Please send by email to the organisers on or before Friday, 30 May 2018.
We are pleased to offer a number of bursaries and especially encourage independent researchers, activists, PhD students and ECRs to apply. Bursaries will cover travel and conference attendance. Please email explaining in up to 150 words how attending or presenting is relevant to the work you are currently doing and providing estimated travel costs. Please apply by 30 April 2018 to the organisers.
Exhibition and workshop
An exhibition linked to urban life and disability and workshop about research involvement are also being organised by The People’s Forum and the Service User and Carer Research Audit Network (SUCRAN), De Montfort University.
Getting to De Montfort University
The venue is The Gallery, ground floor of the Vijay Patel building (LE2 7PT). It is building 40 on the campus map, and is in the centre of campus, next to the Food Village.
- Directions to Leicester and to De Montfort University
- Information about the accessibility of the building
Spaces are limited for this exciting event, so do book early. Lunch and refreshments are included.
- BSA Member – £5
- Non-members – £15
Registration closes on 04 June 2018.
For further information and to submit your abstract, please contact the team via email, firstname.lastname@example.org or click here.
Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only. Materials on this website are not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on this website.
We work with different advertisers and sponsors to bring you free and quality content. We cannot be held liable for the actions of any of these vendors. Any links provided on this website to other websites are not intended to provide an endorsement, approval, recommendation or preference by Psychreg. We have no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the privacy practices or the content of those linked websites whatsoever.
We publish differing views and we foster freedom of expression. Opinion pieces on this website do not reflect the views of the editor or any of our contributors.
We aim to create a platform where people can better understand each other. If you have an alternative view on any of the articles that we published, please email: email@example.com
Read our full disclaimer here.