Home Health & Wellness Monkeys, Like Humans, Persist at Tasks They’ve Already Invested in

Monkeys, Like Humans, Persist at Tasks They’ve Already Invested in

Published: Last updated:
Reading Time: 3 minutes

If you’ve ever stayed in a relationship too long or stuck with a project that was going nowhere, you’re not alone. Humans are generally reluctant to give up on something they’ve already committed time and effort to. It’s called the ‘sunk costs’ phenomenon, where the more resources we sink into an endeavour, the likelier we are to continue – even if we sense it’s futile.

But why would we engage in such potentially self-defeating behaviour?

Georgia State researchers think two factors may play a role. First, it may be a deep, evolutionarily ancient mechanism that helps us balance overall cost and benefit. Second, it may be influenced by uncertainty about the outcome (you never know, it might work out, so why not keep trying?)

Julia Watzek, a recent Georgia State University PhD recipient, and her graduate advisor Professor Sarah Brosnan have shown that both capuchin monkeys and rhesus macaques are susceptible to the same behaviour and that it occurs more often when the monkeys are uncertain about the outcome. Their new study, ‘Capuchin and rhesus monkeys show sunk cost effects in a psychomotor task’, was published recently in Nature’s Scientific Reports.

The monkeys are housed at the university’s Language Research Center, where they have indoor and outdoor areas to live and play in and participate in entirely voluntary and non-invasive cognitive and behavioural research, said Brosnan, who is affiliated with the Department of Psychology and the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience. In fact, she has worked with some of these monkeys for over 20 years. ‘They’re like my second set of kids,’ she said.

In the study, 26 capuchin monkeys and 7 rhesus macaques got to play a simple video game where they operated a joystick, and they needed to move a cursor onto a moving target and keep it there while the target kept moving. If they were successful, they heard a ‘whoop’ sound that indicated success and got a treat. If their cursor lost contact with the moving target, they didn’t get a reward and a new round began. After being trained, the experiment tested them on rounds of either 1, 3, or 7 seconds. ‘Monkeys have really quick reaction times on these games,’ said Brosnan, ‘so one second to them is actually a long time.’

In fact, Watzek said: ‘Most rounds lasted only 1 second. So if you didn’t get a reward after that, it was actually better to quit and start a new round. That would likely get you a treat sooner than if you had kept going.’

The researchers found that both species of monkeys showed sunk cost effects. ‘They persisted 5 to 7 times longer than was optimal,’ said Brosnan, ‘and the longer they had already tried, the more likely they were to complete the entire task.’

Uncertainty played a large part, because when the monkeys got a signal that additional work was required, they were less susceptible to sunk cost behaviour, though they still did demonstrate it.

Studying this phenomenon in animals “teaches us something about how their minds work, as well as our own,” Watzek said.

This is important for several reasons, Brosnan said. First, it suggests that this behaviour is likely driven by evolution and deeply embedded across species.

‘The epitome of the sunk cost is I’ve invested so much in this, I’m just going to keep going,’ Brosnan said. And there may be benefits to this. ‘Sometimes, you need to have patience,’ she said. That helps when you’re foraging for food, hunting prey, waiting for eggs to hatch, seeking a mate, or building a nest or enclosure.

Second, it shows that human capacities like rationalisation, or human concerns like not giving up on something we have publicly committed to, are probably not the main drivers of the sunk cost phenomenon.

And third, it reminds us that there is sometimes a good reason to give up.

‘We’re predisposed to keep trying,’ Brosnan said. ‘And when we find ourselves sticking with things, we should also be a little reflective. Do I have a good reason to keep trying? Or should I leave with no reward, because it will save me more in the long run? That’s really hard to do. But hopefully, we can use our cognitive abilities to help us overcome the emotional heartache of occasional sunk costs.’

© Copyright 2014–2034 Psychreg Ltd