Home Health & Wellness Study Finds Risk of Leukaemia Higher Than Expected in Children With Down Syndrome

Study Finds Risk of Leukaemia Higher Than Expected in Children With Down Syndrome

Published: Last updated:
Reading Time: 3 minutes

A new large-scale study led by UC Davis Health and UC San Francisco researchers assessed the risks of leukaemia in children with Down syndrome. It pointed to stronger than expected associations between Down syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), one type of blood cancer.

Down syndrome is one of the most common genetic conditions in the US and Canada. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 6,000 babies with Down syndrome are born in the US each year. That’s approximately one in every 700 babies born in the US and one in 750 newborns in Canada.

Children with Down syndrome have a substantially increased risk of multiple health conditions compared to the general population. They have a particularly elevated risk (estimated 150-fold) of developing AML before age 5.

The study, published in The Journal of Pediatrics, confirmed that Down syndrome is a strong risk factor for childhood leukaemia.

Study findings on leukaemia in children with Down syndrome

The researchers examined medical data of more than 3.9 million children born 1996–2016 in seven US healthcare systems or in Ontario, Canada. The data included the children’s health information from birth to cancer diagnosis, death, age of 15 years, disenrollment, or 30 December 2016.

‘One main strength of this study is its large cohort with more leukaemia cases in children with Down syndrome than most previous studies,’ said Emily Marlow, first author and a recent graduate from UC Davis Department of Public Health Sciences and Graduate Group in Epidemiology. ‘This allowed more precise risk estimation, especially for rare leukaemia types such as AML-7, previously estimated from small case reports.’

The study estimated the incidence and hazard ratios of leukaemia for children with Down syndrome and other children, adjusting for the health system, child’s age at diagnosis, birth year and sex. It found that 2.8% of children with Down syndrome were diagnosed with leukaemia, compared to 0.05% of other children.

Compared to other children, kids with Down syndrome had a higher risk of AML before age 5 and a higher risk of acute lymphoid leukaemia (ALL) regardless of age. In children with Down syndrome, ALL was more common between ages 2-4 years, while AML was more common in younger kids – the highest incidence during the first year of life. For other children, AML incidence remained very low through age 14 years, whereas ALL peaked at age 3 years and steadily declined until age 8 years.

The study also found that males and Hispanic children were more likely to be diagnosed with Down syndrome and more likely to develop leukaemia than their counterparts. White children have a higher incidence rate of ALL and more likely to have Down syndrome than Black children.

Catching leukaemia in kids

The researchers urged parents with kids with Down syndrome to keep an eye for signs of leukaemia. Common symptoms include fatigue or pale skin, infections and fever, easy bleeding or bruising, shortness of breath and coughing. Parents are advised to talk to the paediatrician if their children exhibit any of these symptoms.

‘The good news is that childhood leukaemia can be very treatable if caught early,’ said co-senior author Diana Miglioretti, professor and division chief of biostatistics at the UC Davis Department of Public Health Sciences and an affiliate investigator with Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research.

Imaging technologies and leukaemia

A steep rise in medical imaging over the past two decades, particularly in computed tomography (CT) exams, increased children’s exposure to higher levels of radiation. Previous studies have shown that CT scanning increases leukaemia risk.

‘Given the potential for ionising radiation to increase leukaemia risk in children with Down syndrome, other non-ionising radiation modes of imaging, such as ultrasound and MRI, should be used as the first line image tests,’ said co-senior author Rebecca Smith-Bindman, a UCSF School of Medicine professor with the Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.

© Copyright 2014–2034 Psychreg Ltd