There has been a distinct failure by the legal profession, over the years, to obtain full and proper assessments of clients suffering from one or more mental health issues. This means the profession is letting down its clients and acting without the highest standards in mind.
Even where there are clearly issues for concern, there has been a failure in many cases to obtain appropriate psychiatric or psychological assessments. This needs to change.
I have specialised in the field of criminal defence for 14 years, the last 8 years operating as a licensed paralegal preparing cases for my own clients both within solicitor firms and more recently on a privately funded client basis. Consequently, I have been involved in the preparation of defence cases for a considerable number of clients with mental health issues.
In the last two years with an awareness of mental health issues even being raised by members of our Royal Family, the onus must surely be on the authorities and legal professionals throughout the UK to thoroughly consider a client’s potential mental health state from the outset. This should start at the police station interview stage.
For example, adverse behaviour as a child or teenager growing up in care or within a dysfunctional or disadvantaged family is currently deemed to be not enough of a concern for many legal representatives to consider further investigation or produce expert reports.
Such incidents have led to miscarriages of justice in the past, yet, still, today not enough consideration is given to those with mental health issues who get caught up within the criminal justice system.
As a police station accredited representative, I have attended at police stations, and other venues, to advise and assist clients who are being interviewed by the police. At the police station when a client has been arrested and is being booked into the custody suite, they are asked if they suffer from mental health issues as part of the welfare check. Many will not divulge that information due to a perceived stigma associated with mental health.
I recall one client where their mental health issues were known to exist and a mental health nurse was on hand to determine whether the client was fit to be detained and fit to be interviewed. That nurse determined that the client was fit. I arrived, and, in consultation with my client, it was clear that they were unfit because they were talking about angels and the devil; they clearly did not understand the reason for their arrest or where they were. Having made representations to the mental health nurse and the custody sergeant, I was advised that despite my concerns and representations, the interview would proceed! Within a minute of that interview commencing the police officer agreed that the client was not fit to be interviewed nor detained. The client was subsequently released into the care of their carer. Clearly, there had been a significant error on the part of the police force and their mental health nurse. Thus, it is imperative that police station accredited representatives and solicitors take the time to assess a client and perhaps, more importantly, make suitable representations to the police and mental health professionals if there are concerns.
Another incident concerning a client with mental health issues involved one who was already serving a significantly longer sentence. That client advised me that they became involved in bad behaviour as they believed that they would be killed if they were not segregated. That client had received no mental health care in the, approximately, 10 years they had been incarcerated. Due to my concerns, a full psychiatric and psychological assessment and an expert report were obtained. It transpired that one of the experts believed that the client’s original case was unfair due to the client’s mental health issues and that the client should consider appointing a legal professional to look at their original case with a view to submitting a fresh application to appeal. That client, with the diagnosis, evidence, and advice submitted in the expert reports, was finally given mental health care and treatment in the prison.
These are just two examples of many I have dealt with, some in relation to submitting applications for leave to appeal, where I firmly believe a miscarriage of justice has taken place.
So, what needs to be done to address the issue? Here is what I believe needs to happen in order for the legal profession to better serve people with mental health challenges:
- Start at the police station: full and proper assessment by mental health nurses at the police station stage. The aim is to determine how a client suffers from mental health issues, their real ability to understand and give instructions, and their ability to undergo an interview. All too often clients are deemed fit for an interview at the police station when, clearly, they are not.
- Education: education of legal professionals – defence and prosecution – to help them understand mental health issues and treatment options. Legal professionals need to be further trained to note and consider these issues if they have concerns when dealing with a client. They need to be encouraged to obtain those vital expert reports, from psychiatrists and psychologists, on their client’s mental health. More often than not those assessments prove vital to the outcome for the client.
- Utilising help: deeper consideration and use of hospital orders. Help available from the probation services should be used and it should be ensured that the most vulnerable are protected by the courts.
- Assessment: an in-depth assessment by the Crown-instructed expert psychiatrists and psychologists. Often these people are given only the defence expert report and prosecution evidence. The Crown’s experts should be given sight of the medical records of those they are assessing, and they should provide a full assessment and report on the person’s ability to understand the trial process and take part in it. They should not be asked simply to provide a report aimed solely at a continuation of prosecuting a defendant. Often the full mental health issues are not covered in these Crown-instructed reports.
- Rehabilitation: prisons should revert to proper rehabilitation techniques. These appear to have waned over the past ten years or so. This should include a suitable assessment of those with suspected mental health issues, particularly within the autism spectrum, ADHD, and PTSD – all of which can be complex. Appropriate treatment should be given to those serving custodial sentences. Those with significant learning difficulties, low IQ, or both should be provided with approved courses and treatment to help with coping and progression, as well as support with obtaining employment once released. The government should put in place a service for those released from prison who suffer from mental health issues so that they may continue to be provided with assistance and treatment, in order to reduce reoffending behaviours.
- Intermediaries: the use of intermediaries in court proceedings appears to be a rarity. In a world where there is a significant trend towards those with mental health issues facing proceedings before the courts, intermediaries should be instructed to assist the client during trials and other hearings or conferences where necessary. This intermediary service is currently heavily overlooked.
On a positive note, there appears to be a very gradual rollout of psychiatrists being available at the courts to assess defendants facing sentencing – a very tiny step, but certainly one in the right direction. However, my concern is that there are not enough hours in a day at the court for a full and proper assessment to be carried out.
Without a full assessment, defendants will not be offered appropriate treatment or sentencing plans.
Full expert reports should be obtained by defence solicitors or firms on their client’s behalf where and when possible. Legal aid funding is available for these expert reports where clients are legally aided. For those clients who are privately funding their defence case, their defence team should advise them about the importance of obtaining expert reports on a client’s mental health issues – albeit potentially at a significant cost to the privately funded client.
Mental health is a wide-ranging condition that is all too often either not fully considered by legal professionals and related authorities or not considered at all. This attitude and lack of proper consideration must change for future generations.
Image credit: Pixabay
Caroline Spencer-Boulton is a NALP Licensed Paralegal from 24:7 Criminal Defence.
Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only; materials on this website are not intended to be a substitute for professional advice. Don’t disregard professional advice or delay in seeking treatment because of what you have read on this website. Read our full disclaimer.