Home Education & Learning 1 in 5 Families in England Miss Out on First-Choice School

1 in 5 Families in England Miss Out on First-Choice School

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Last week, hundreds of thousands of English families received the pivotal news of which secondary school their child received an offer from. But for nearly 20% of them, it was a disappointing outcome rather than their first choice.

According to The Telegraph’s analysis of early admission rate data, only 81.6% of students in England were admitted to their preferred school for the coming academic year. While marking a slight 0.5% increase from 2020, it means that once again, roughly 1 in 5 children will be attending a school that was not their top pick.

Behind the national average are immense regional disparities. Some counties boasted enviously high first-choice offer rates surpassing 95%, such as Wiltshire and East Riding. However for metropolitan areas like Birmingham and Reading, only 71–72% received their first choice offer, much lower than the national benchmark.

The statistics grow increasingly dire in certain London boroughs, where admission offer rates dip into the low 60th percentile and below. Lewisham, Richmond upon Thames, and Hammersmith & Fulham were among some London authorities with the country’s worst rates.

London Councils report that the capital’s overall first-choice admission rate reached 71%, a negligible 0.79% increase from 2020. The group cites declining birth rates and families moving out of London since the pandemic as contributing factors for this year’s 2.5% drop in applications. And shrinking student numbers means decreased budgets and resources for London’s state schools.

Oversubscribed schools lead to worse admissions luck

So what’s behind the vastly differing admission rates across England’s regions? Teacher unions point to oversubscription as a major exacerbating factor. Particularly in high-demand areas, there are more children competing for limited seats at the highest-performing state schools.

Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the NAHT union, stated that an ongoing “pupil population bulge” has placed undue strain on admissions. The imbalance between supply and demand for places fuels tense competition. While officials emphasise that most families receive one of their three top selections, the data shows access to first-choice schools is anything but equal.

Uneven impacts and outcomes

Critics argue the regional variations reflect much deeper social inequities in England’s education system. Less affluent areas often suffer from higher student-to-teacher ratios, fewer resources, and disadvantaged intake groups. This compounds the negative effects for students who miss out on selective schools.

There are also economic impacts on families. Students travelling longer distances to second- or third-choice schools incur higher transport costs, not to mention logistical hassles. And the difference between attending an outstanding, good, requires improvement, or inadequate Ofsted-rated institution directly shapes children’s learning environments and future prospects.

Calling for policy changes

In light of yet another difficult admissions cycle, education leaders are underscoring the need for policy reforms. Proposals range from catchment area adjustments, enforcing standardised admissions criteria, to even lottery-based allocation systems.

Department for Education officials highlight that over 90% of families receive one of their three preferences. They also trumpet the government’s track record of creating over 1.2 million new places since 2010.

But teachers union heads like Whiteman argue change is overdue. In his words: “There is extra pressure on secondary admissions this year as there is a pupil population bulge…Many schools are particularly oversubscribed.” Without interventions, thousands of students each year will continue to be allocated second, third or fourth-best options.

Journeys for justice

For parents across England still reeling from last week’s news, the fight is not over. They face arduous appeals processes and anxious waiting lists for top choices. But many are also galvanised to lobby local authorities for revisions addressing their dilemmas.

While deemed a logistical nuisance by officials, school admissions encapsulate much broader issues about equal access to education. Its impacts resonate throughout the affected children’s lives. Perhaps this year’s troubling figures will serve as a tipping point for pushing through changes and creating a fairer system for all.

© Copyright 2014–2034 Psychreg Ltd