An expert panel convened by the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF) and The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration (AFTD) provides guidance on best practices for the design of early drug trials for Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal degeneration (FTD), and other neurodegenerative dementias. Their guidance was published in the 18th May 2021 issue of Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.
These efficiencies in clinical trials can help to achieve proof of concept more rapidly and at lower costs. The estimated cost of developing an Alzheimer’s drug is eight times more than a cancer drug and takes nearly twice as long to develop. The panel, which comprised clinicians, researchers, and statisticians from academia, biotech, and pharmaceutical companies, as well as ADDF and AFTD scientific staff, focused on early phase 1 and 2 exploratory trials, which assess a drug’s safety and pharmacologic effects on patients. Exploratory studies with optimised study designs can terminate programmes not likely to succeed and efficiently move promising programmes through the clinical trial process. Later phase 2 and phase 3 trials measure clinical outcomes such as memory and ability to perform daily functions.
‘The majority of clinical development costs come from later stage phase 2b and phase 3 studies, which require long treatment periods and a large number of patients to detect meaningful changes in cognitive, behavioural, and functional endpoints,’ said Howard Fillit, MD, ADDF founding executive director and chief science officer. ‘Results from exploratory phase 2a trials are the critical inflexion point when researchers decide which drugs to move into these larger and more expensive trials, so clearly these phase 2a trials need to be as rigorous and well-designed as possible.’
The panel makes four key recommendations for exploratory trial study designs
By adopting best practices in designing exploratory trials, researchers and companies can be more confident in using their results to make the all-important go or no-go decisions about advancing drugs to larger later-stage trials. The four key panel recommendations are to:
- Employ rigorous statistical analyses and procedures, engaging statisticians in trial design as early as possible.
- Incorporate the appropriate biomarker and clinical endpoints that reflect the drug’s mechanism of action and the specific study population.
- Leverage historical data to determine appropriate outcome measures that are well-aligned with the disease and mechanism of action for the treatment.
- Consider novel clinical development plans to increase efficiency in moving a drug candidate into larger clinical trials or determining that it is ineffective as quickly as possible; avoid ‘cookie-cutter’ trial designs that are not optimised or tailored.
‘These four recommendations can lead to more efficient trials, with substantial financial savings, as well as more strategic and effective engagement of patients,’ said AFTD CEO Susan Dickinson. ‘The latter is a key concern for a rare disease like FTD where the low number of patients pushes the need for strategic study design, with patients enrolled only in studies that will provide a clear and accurate readout of therapeutic efficacy.’
‘We clearly need exploratory trials to be rigorous and efficient,’ said Dr Fillit. ‘But this is about working toward the ultimate success – effective treatment strategies, which will likely be a combination drug approach that hits several of the biological pathways involved in the neurodegenerative process of dementia. That means being able to take multiple shots on goal – testing a wide variety of plausible drug candidates to identify the most promising ones.’
The articles we publish on Psychreg are here to educate and inform. They’re not meant to take the place of expert advice. So if you’re looking for professional help, don’t delay or ignore it because of what you’ve read here. Check our full disclaimer.