8,928 total views, 1 views today
Last Sunday 22nd February, Nicola Beaumont voiced her disappointment of The Psychologist ‘s focus on its March 2020 issue: decolonising psychology. As expected, her views attracted a vast pile-on – from people questioning her qualifications, to uncertainties whether she’s fit to work within the psychology profession.
It’s not the first time that Nicola shared her sentiment. In January she said that she ‘very much doubted that The Psychologist would publish anything that supported Brexit or supported conservative views, because there would be outrage from leftists’.
I share Nicola’s observation that the BPS magazine has consistently push left-wing types of agendas. For instance, in the run-up to Brexit, views which opposed it regularly appeared in the magazine. There are also a number of articles that demonise Trump – I noticed these things because I am both pro-Brexit and pro-Trump.
I could easily capitalise on the kind of predominant views you’ll find in The Psychologist, the kind that promotes the victimhood narrative and social justice agenda. But I find these obsession to be boring and tiresome. It feels like victimhood and hatred of white people (especially of white heterosexual men) are encouraged.
And I just don’t use the word ‘obsession’ for no reason. Here’s a selection of articles published on The Psychologist for the last six years which exemplifies this agenda I’m referring to:
Now contrast the above list to conservative views and it won’t take you long to notice that there is a scarcity of articles on The Psychologist that positively talk about the contributions of Dr Jordan Peterson, articles that explore the views of Dr Noah Carl on race and IQ, or the ones that covers the unusual viewpoints within evolutionary psychology which you can read in Quillette.
As much as I hate identity politics, I feel that it is relevant to share my background: I’m gay and I spent my childhood in a slum in the Philippines – a country which has been colonised four times.
That said, I can easily rack up intersectionality and victimhood points. Yet, I never perceive myself as a victim of other people or circumstances; I always see myself as someone who is responsible for shaping my own destiny. I refuse to embrace victimhood; I always aim to be responsible for my own actions and incompetence – rather than someone who plays the victim card just to get on with life. Studying psychology encouraged me to operate on self-actualisation.
I find The Psychologist to be an excellent repository of articles on racism and victimhood. Yet, as an immigrant, I never see the UK as a racist country. I’ve lived in five countries before coming here: Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, and Germany. And I can say that I have witnessed more racism in Singapore and Thailand than here.
I don’t wish to invalidate other people’s experiences, but since I moved here (I came here in 2013 to do a master’s degree in psychology) I never experienced any form of discrimination or racism – perhaps because I don’t go on with my life scouting around for something to be offended about. I also spent most of my days in the company of white people, because I’m the kind of immigrant who assimilates.
When I expressed my views on the kind of narratives that you would likely read on The Psychologist, I was told (via Twitter) that other topics are not being pushed out from the magazine, to which I clarified that I am not talking about topics, but rather about views on topics. For instance, I am not convinced that all readers of the magazine think that psychology needs to be decolonised.
In a time of such polarisation, I hope that the magazine would diversify its views – instead of obsessing on social justice dogmas. It just feels like you’re reading social justice pieces straight from The Guardian – which would be acceptable if that’s what I signed up for. But then, I didn’t choose to read The Guardian.
Editor’s note: An alternative view on this topic has been written by Derek Laffan.
Image credit: Freepik
Some of our contents and links are sponsored. Psychreg is not responsible for the contents of external websites. Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice, nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on this website. We run a directory of mental health service providers.
We published differing views. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of Psychreg and its correspondents. Any content provided by our authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any individual or organisation. You’re welcome to write for us.
Read our full disclaimer.