1,043 total views, 5 views today
Children’s drawings are a mirror to their mind. It is a reflection of their feelings, emotions, and their cognitive development. The early works of psychologists dating back to the 1920s were focused on children’s drawings as a measure of their intellectual abilities.
This was generally based on the principle of counting the number of body parts drawn against a prescribed list (such as head, eyes, or arms) and arriving at a score reflecting the child’s intellectual ability.
However, while this aspect of children’s drawings appears to be straightforward, it was largely thanks to the work of Elizabeth Koppitz that led to the evaluation of children’s drawings not just by counting the number of body parts but also considering the manner in which it was drawn. For example, according to Koppitz an exaggerated size would indicate greater interest by the child in the topic drawn, use of shading as a sign that the child has specific feelings for what has been drawn, or any additions to the drawings as an indication of the extent to which the child has an interest in the topic drawn.
As a result of these early observations a growing body of research during the past decades aimed to examine the extent to which children’s drawings could be a measure of their feelings, fears, likes and dislikes, anxieties, family relationships, and so on.
For example, in our studies we looked at children’s drawings in the context of interest in sport from a cross-cultural perspective and how interest in football may manifest itself in how children draw a football player. We further speculated that certain features of a child’s drawing may be a predictor of their sporting ability.
There is, however, another aspect of assessment of children’s drawings, namely when it is done during the time that the child is undergoing or has gone through unpleasant life events.
In one of our recent works we reported how children affected by ethnic divide may reflect in their drawings their feelings towards ‘others’ in an ethnically divided society.
Prior to the above, we studied children in a hospital school recovering from a long term illness and how their feelings are reflected in the manner in which they draw themselves and their best friend.
It is with this line of research in mind that one turns to the current virus pandemic and many countries experiencing lockdown. It seems that children’s drawing could once again be seen in these unique and very difficult circumstances as a reflection of their feelings and emotions towards themselves and others. For example, the drawing of a picture of sunshine and the rainbow is now a reflection of children’s appreciation for medical staff in their battle with the pandemic.
Similarly there have also been reports of how children have expressed their feelings in their drawings about themselves and their family during the lockdown. For example, drawing of a ‘giant, sparkling heart that coronavirus can’t penetrate‘ by an Italian child.
It seems that children worldwide, during this virus pandemic and lockdown are expressing their feelings and emotions in their drawings about themselves, their family, friends and key members of their society, in particular medical staff. Valuable insight can be gained from examination of the children’s drawings as an expression of their feelings and emotions and the extent to which the current events have affected them.
The question, however, is to what extent could our current understanding of children’s drawings help in our evaluation of the drawings? Could we still make reference to measures such as size, shading, additions and so on as reported in the past studies to help with evaluation of what has been drawn under this lockdown situation? Or would this lockdown manifest different and unique forms of expression of feelings and emotions in children’s drawings worldwide?
Image credit: Freepik
Dr Bahman Baluch is an Associate Professor and Chartered Psychologist at Middlesex University. His main research interests are cognitive and developmental psychology.
Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only. Materials on this website are not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on this website.
We work with different advertisers and sponsors to bring you free and quality content. We cannot be held liable for the actions of any of these vendors. Any links provided on this website to other websites are not intended to provide an endorsement, approval, recommendation or preference by Psychreg. We have no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the privacy practices or the content of those linked websites whatsoever.
We publish differing views and we foster freedom of expression. Opinion pieces on this website do not reflect the views of the editor or any of our contributors.
We aim to create a platform where people can better understand each other. If you have an alternative view on any of the articles that we published, please email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Read our full disclaimer here.