The Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction Research Programme is offering:
- Four bursaries of R 70,000 each to students wishing to study full-time towards a master’s degree (by thesis only);
- Two bursaries of R 100, 000 each to students wishing to study full-time towards a PhD;
- One post-doctoral fellowship.
- Successful candidates will conduct research in the broad area of the research programme (see further details below) and will contribute to the administration of the research programme.
Successful applicants will work as part of a team on one of the following topics:
- Formative evaluation of youth sexuality programme (1 master’s level);
- Supportability in pregnancy: (2 master’s level).
- Abortion counselling: (1 Master’s level; 1 doctoral level; 1 post-doctoral)
- Constructions of youth sexualities (1 doctoral level).
Candidates must have a good pass in a relevant social science honours degree. The following are requirements for the projects listed above:
- Speak isiXhosa; good qualitative research skills;
- Good quantitative research skills (for one study);
- Doctoral and post-doctoral level: qualified as psychologist (clinical, counselling, educational); good qualitative research skills;
- Good qualitative research skills.
To apply, please send the following documentation to the project administrator, Megan Reuvers, on email@example.com on or before 09 September 2018:
- Covering letter outlining your interest in the bursary and research programme, and your experience, or training, in conducting research;
- Academic record;
- Curriculum vitae;
- Sample of academic writing (not more than 12 pages);
- Reference letter from previous supervisor or lecturer.
Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction Research Programme
The Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction research programme is a multi-disciplinary programme funded by the National Research Foundation South African Research Chair Initiative (SARChI), Rhodes University and the British Academy International Mobility Grant. It draws on the expertise of a number of researchers both within Rhodes University and at universities/NGOs in South Africa and across the world.
Despite the introduction of enabling sexual and reproductive health legislation, and the implementation of a range of public health, non-governmental and educational interventions, South Africa is faced with multiple challenges surrounding sexuality and reproduction, including: high levels of forced sexual debut, sexual coercion and violence; transactional sex; HIV infection; rape (including child rape); hate crimes against lesbian women and gay men (including ‘corrective’ rape); unwanted and unsupportable pregnancies; and a high maternal mortality rate. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health service provision include structural factors (e.g., travelling distances and cost incursion in reaching a facility), and a range of social dynamics (e.g., abortion is seen in some areas as destructive of cultural values and traditions).
The above-mentioned challenges and barriers are simultaneously rooted in, and serve to perpetuate, a range of social inequities centred on race, class, ability, sexual orientation, age and gender. The overarching goal of the Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction (CSSR) research programme is to conduct critical research that addresses the social and human dynamics underpinning our slow progress towards full sexual and reproductive citizenship for all.
The aims of the CSSR research programme are to analyse: (1) discourses and narratives (the technologies of representation) concerning sexualities (e.g., sexual orientation, ‘adolescent’ sexuality) and reproduction/pregnancy deployed in public and private spaces; (2) the interstice between carers (such as health service providers and teachers) and the recipients of sexual and reproductive health or education services (the technologies of intervention); (3) the range of taken-for-granted assumptions or absent traces (e.g., regarding the nature of adolescence, mothering, family formation and function, race and class) that underpin interventions with respect to, and representations of, sexuality and reproduction; (4) how the governmental technologies of representation and of intervention achieve or undermine gendering, racialising and class-based effects, and lead to the continuation or discontinuation of sexual and reproductive health inequities; (5) the manner in which particular discourses, narratives and practices regarding sexualities and reproduction are maintained or resisted in the everyday lives of men, women and their families; (6) the manner in which the technologies of representation and the technologies of intervention promote or hinder sexual and reproductive health, sexual and reproductive citizenship and sexual and reproductive justice; and, (7) how equal sexual and reproductive citizenship may be promoted through policy and practice.
The research steps outside of the usual biomedical or public health approach to sexual and reproductive health. Rather a post-colonialist, post-structuralist feminist approach and in-depth qualitative methodologies are utilised to illuminate the multiple and complex social processes embedded in sexualities and reproduction. While it is acknowledged that interventions (e.g., sexuality education programmes, good antenatal care, the provision of safe and accessible abortion, the provision of good postnatal care, and the promotion of non-discrimination in workplaces) have the potential to make a difference in men’s and women’s sexual and reproductive lives, there are also multiple ways in which such programmes and the surrounding public discourses concerning sexuality, gender and reproduction can serve in often unintended and unwitting ways to perpetuate rather than undermine existing gendered, racialised and class-based power relations and stereotypical assumptions. The CSSR research programme highlights how particular discourses, narratives, practices and power relations concerning sexuality and reproduction promote inclusion or exclusion, belonging or marginalisation, equity or inequity, justice or injustice, access to, or denial of, sexual and reproductive rights.
In addition to the theoretically informed empirical work, the research programme contributes to theoretical and methodological debates in sexualities and reproduction, in feminist theory and in qualitative research. In line with the theoretical paradigm, the methodologies used involve data collection through interviews, focus group discussions, observations, online discussions, gathering relevant media and policy documents, recordings of interventions, and focussed ethnography. Analytical methods include narrative analysis, discourse analysis, narrative-discursive analysis, conversation analysis, qualitative content analysis, and performative/performance analysis, depending on the project.
Research activities fall under the following broad interconnected areas: (1) sexualities; (2) reproduction; and (3) unsupportable pregnancies/abortion. Within each of these broad areas, a number of related themes of inquiry are conducted.
For further information please click here.
The articles we publish on Psychreg are here to educate and inform. They’re not meant to take the place of expert advice. So if you’re looking for professional help, don’t delay or ignore it because of what you’ve read here. Check our full disclaimer.