103 total views, 1 views today
The past two days have seen some intense discussion on Twitter about the alleged obsession with social justice issues and left-leaning views in the BPS magazine, The Psychologist.
I would like to add these thoughts to the discussion, based on answers I gave to a BPS survey a few weeks ago.
The survey asked: ‘We would like to know what changes and additions you would prioritise and like to see in the BPS of the future. Please give us your top three suggestions.’
These were my suggestions (edited a little for clarity):
Promote a diversity of views on gender
Diversity is a good thing, but the BPS needs to think about how diverse it is in the gender ratio of members, especially among clinical psychologists, of whom around 80% are female.
At present men make up a minority of clients, and this might be in part related to preferring to talk about some issues (sex-related issues or domestic violence, for instance) with a male therapist. But more important than the sex of the therapist, is the therapist’s outlook on gender issues.
As a profession – men and women – we need to consider moving away from views such as the notion that patriarchy and traditional masculinity are a major cause of men’s mental health problems (for example, as shown in pages 124-8 of the long version of the Power Threat Meaning Framework). Although these views about patriarchy (and other issues) might resonate with some male clients, I suspect they could alienate many others.
Diversity of sociopolitical views
It is a fact that – generally speaking – psychologists lean to the left in terms of their sociopolitical views. To the degree that the general public know this – and I think many do – the BPS might consider the impact of this on the therapeutic alliance and how likely clients with other views are likely to see a therapist if their views are likely to different strongly.
I don’t offer a solution to this, except that the BPS might reflect on how this large trend to the left might be seen by the general public and potential therapy clients.
‘Hard to reach’ clients
We need more flexibility in thinking about how to reach ‘hard to reach’ clients, and the therapeutic approaches that are likely to work for them. My two previous points are relevant here.
Editor’s note: This article was published originally in Male Psychology Network.
Image credit: Freepik
Dr John Barry is a Chartered Psychologist and co-founder of the Male Psychology Network and Male Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society.
Some of our contents and links are sponsored. Psychreg is not responsible for the contents of external websites. Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice, nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on this website. We run a directory of mental health service providers.
We published differing views. The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of Psychreg and its correspondents. Any content provided by our authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any individual or organisation. You’re welcome to write for us.
Read our full disclaimer.