244 total views, 1 views today
Researchers have previously identified brain structural signatures associated with individual neurological diseases using techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In a new study, a team of scientists based in Germany has compared data from multiple studies to find brain structural abnormalities shared between four different neuropsychiatric conditions. The researchers also found brain signatures that were unique to individual conditions.
The work, led by Dr Bernhard Baune and Dr Udo Dannlowski from the University of Münster in Germany, was published in Biological Psychiatry.
Co-first author Dr Nils Opel (together with Janik Goltermann) said of the work: ‘the identification of shared and disorder-specific brain structural signatures might enhance the future development of biologically informed diagnostic applications in psychiatry.’
The team analysed data collected as part of the effort by an international research consortium called ENIGMA, for ‘Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta Analysis’ which uses genetic and imaging studies to understand brain diseases. The 11 multi-centre studies collected brain-imaging data from over 12,000 people.
‘We found that four major psychiatric disorders – major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder – show a surprisingly high level of similarity in their brain structural abnormalities,’ said Dr Opel. The shared brain areas showing structural aberrations were mainly in cortical areas associated with cognitive processing, memory and self-awareness.
On the flip side, Dr Opel added: ‘We were able to identify regional abnormalities with high specificity for certain disorders.’ Interestingly, these distinct structural differences sometimes appeared in the same area for two disorders, but in opposite directions from the norm.
In contrast, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder did not share brain structural signatures with any other disorders. That may be because those disorders are considered developmental diseases with a distinct aetiology from the other psychiatric conditions, which have more in common.
The researchers do not yet understand the mechanisms behind the shared structural elements, but a growing body of evidence shows that these psychiatric disorders also share common genetic as well as environmental influences, which might underlie the current findings.
‘Our understanding arising from brain imaging studies of the biology of neuropsychiatric disorders is changing,’ said Dr John Krystal, Editor of Biological Psychiatry. ‘Initially, we focused on the individual properties of particular patient groups. Then, some imaging studies suggested that neuropsychiatric disorders were dimensionally related. This new study affirms the dimensional relationship among some disorders, but suggests that some categorical distinctions may exist at the biological level.’
The finding of regional abnormalities specific to individual conditions, Dr Opel added, ‘could help shift the focus of future psychiatric and neuroscientific research on brain regions that appear to be central to disorder-specific biological processes and hence might facilitate the discovery of mechanisms underlying the development of specific psychiatric disorders.’
Image credit: Freepik
Psychreg is mainly for information purposes only. Materials on this website are not intended to be a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, medical treatment, or therapy. Never disregard professional psychological or medical advice nor delay in seeking professional advice or treatment because of something you have read on this website.
We work with different advertisers and sponsors to bring you free and quality content. We cannot be held liable for the actions of any of these vendors. Any links provided on this website to other websites are not intended to provide an endorsement, approval, recommendation or preference by Psychreg. We have no liability or responsibility whatsoever for the privacy practices or the content of those linked websites whatsoever.
We publish differing views and we foster freedom of expression. Opinion pieces on this website do not reflect the views of the editor or any of our contributors.
We aim to create a platform where people can better understand each other. If you have an alternative view on any of the articles that we published, please email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Read our full disclaimer here.